- From: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 09:17:06 +0000
- To: public-gld-wg@w3.org
On 17/03/13 11:03, Sarven Capadisli wrote: > On 03/05/2013 03:28 PM, Dave Reynolds wrote: >> I've released what I hope is a reasonable initial candidate for the Last >> Call WD for the Data Cube vocabulary. This is preparation for the vote >> on Thursday. >> >> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/data-cube/index.html >> >> I'll send a separate note around on where we are with the various >> issues. However, I think this draft resolves each of the issues in the >> way discussed in the separate email threads. >> >> Richard please check this. Feel free to fix minor problems or ask me to. >> Major problems should probably be raised on the list. >> >> Benedikt - thanks for volunteering to do a review check. Please let us >> know of any problems that you spot. >> >> The most substantial change from the last WD is the section on criteria >> for well-formed Data Cubes (ISSUE-29 [1]). The criteria discussions have >> been on the list. The SPARQL queries which are provided (to back up the >> narrative descriptions of the criteria) have all been checked on at >> least some positive and negative examples. The code for this is in the >> same repository where the vocabulary source sits [2]. >> >> I have one more task before putting down the edit token, which is to >> find a way to have a "Contributors" section to list Jeni, rather than >> leave here in the Acknowledgements. >> >> Dave >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/29 >> >> [2] https://code.google.com/p/publishing-statistical-data/ >> > > Minor: > > Turtle Examples 16 and 17 should use @prefix instead of PREFIX. Thanks for spotting that, editorial fix done. Dave
Received on Monday, 18 March 2013 09:17:36 UTC