- From: Sarven Capadisli <sarven.capadisli@deri.org>
- Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 12:03:38 +0100
- To: public-gld-wg@w3.org
On 03/05/2013 03:28 PM, Dave Reynolds wrote: > I've released what I hope is a reasonable initial candidate for the Last > Call WD for the Data Cube vocabulary. This is preparation for the vote > on Thursday. > > https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/data-cube/index.html > > I'll send a separate note around on where we are with the various > issues. However, I think this draft resolves each of the issues in the > way discussed in the separate email threads. > > Richard please check this. Feel free to fix minor problems or ask me to. > Major problems should probably be raised on the list. > > Benedikt - thanks for volunteering to do a review check. Please let us > know of any problems that you spot. > > The most substantial change from the last WD is the section on criteria > for well-formed Data Cubes (ISSUE-29 [1]). The criteria discussions have > been on the list. The SPARQL queries which are provided (to back up the > narrative descriptions of the criteria) have all been checked on at > least some positive and negative examples. The code for this is in the > same repository where the vocabulary source sits [2]. > > I have one more task before putting down the edit token, which is to > find a way to have a "Contributors" section to list Jeni, rather than > leave here in the Acknowledgements. > > Dave > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/29 > > [2] https://code.google.com/p/publishing-statistical-data/ > Minor: Turtle Examples 16 and 17 should use @prefix instead of PREFIX. -Sarven
Received on Sunday, 17 March 2013 11:04:09 UTC