- From: John Erickson <olyerickson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 07:57:24 -0500
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Cc: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, public-gld-wg@w3.org
+1 to Phil's comments and -10 to dropping dcat:permanentIdentifier With the advent of DataCite DOIs and other PIDs for scientific data including EPIC and (soon to be announced) DCO-IDs --- all based on the Handle System --- and with the emerging application of DCAT to research data management, I strongly endorse inclusion of a field for the PID. John On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: > Instinctively I dislike this intensely. It encourages bad practice by > suggesting that identifiers for data sets should all be treated as ephemeral > except the special case of the dcat:permanentIdentifier. Gah! > > If you create a catalogue as an aggregate of other catalogues (like > publicdata.eu) then you jolly well SHOULD use the original URIs from the > original catalogue. If you don't/can't/won't, then at least have the decency > to include owl:sameAs links. > > As ever, I am aware that I take a purist view and that practicality can play > a trump card - meaning that if there are cases where the reason for wanting > permanentIdentifier is something a lot better than "we like the way we do it > so we're going to use our lovely foo.aspx?sessionID=claptrap" URIs but we > recognise that your well designed > http://{domain}/{type}/{concept}/{reference} URI might have something going > for it" then OK, I won't be intransigent - but I don't like it. > > So, -1 from me, but I remain open to persuasion if the evidence is there. > > Phil. > > > > > > > On 08/03/2013 11:26, Richard Cyganiak wrote: >> >> There are two remaining issues on DCAT that we couldn't address in the >> telco. A Proposals for one of them is below. If you have any objection to >> the proposed course of action, please say so via email. >> >> >> ISSUE-14: add dcat:permanentIdentifier property >> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/track/issues/14 >> >> With some regret, I have to say: >> >> PROPOSAL: Postpone ISSUE-14, as there is no consensus on such a property. >> > > -- > > Phil Archer > W3C eGovernment > > http://philarcher.org > +44 (0)7887 767755 > @philarcher1 > -- John S. Erickson, Ph.D. Director, Web Science Operations Tetherless World Constellation (RPI) <http://tw.rpi.edu> <olyerickson@gmail.com> Twitter & Skype: olyerickson
Received on Friday, 8 March 2013 12:57:57 UTC