- From: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2013 17:49:16 +0000
- To: Benedikt Kaempgen <kaempgen@fzi.de>
- CC: Government Linked Data Working Group <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
Hi Benedikt, On 07/03/13 17:19, Benedikt Kaempgen wrote: > Larger feedback: > > ==10.2 Hierarchical code lists== > * For OLAP on QB [1], I use hierarchy levels of increasing detail as first class citizens in the data, e.g., to give them a name such as "Product Brand". Therefore, I am using XKOS for representing hierarchy levels (xkos:ClassificationLevel, subclass of skos:Collection) [2]. > * Here, I would still use skos:narrower to define relationships between skos:Concepts. > * However, I would connect those concepts via skos:member to separate xkos:ClassificationLevels, each having a xkos:depth, and would then connect those xkos:ClassificationLevels via skos:inScheme to the code list. > * Also, I would not declare skos:topConcept but rather define the top concepts via an upmost level (depth 0 or 1). > * I want to make sure that I still comply with the vocabulary and do "not use terms from other vocabularies instead of ones defined in this vocabulary that could reasonably be used". > * Thus, my question: Can publishers still reuse XKOS together with QB? I think, we should allow and clarify this. For instance, this could mean to allow that skos:Collections are connected to a code list instead of using skos:hasTopConcept. I agree that you should be able to use xkos with QB. I don't think it is appropriate to specially call out xkos so the question is whether any change is required in the current text. We now explicitly allow skos:Collection as a qb:codeList (see the owl:unionOf range declaration that was added to address ISSUE-39). The relevant well-formedness criterion is IC-19 [1] which expects that if the codeList is a skos:ConceptScheme then the concepts link to the scheme via skos:inScheme and if it is a skos:Collection then that should link to the concepts via skos:member. I think that this allows your usage but if you think that needs to change then now's the time to say! [I'll address the editorial issues separately.] Cheers, Dave [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/data-cube/index.html#ic-19
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2013 17:49:51 UTC