W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-gld-wg@w3.org > March 2013

[QB] Disposition of issues

From: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 15:03:44 +0000
Message-ID: <51360950.2010706@gmail.com>
To: Government Linked Data Working Group <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
I'd like us to clean up the ISSUEs and ACTIONs list for Data Cube.

Here's a summary of where I believe we are on each of these.

ISSUE-29  Well-formedness

Discussed on list thread [1]. I believe we have a good set of criteria 
and SPARQL queries to implement them. This is reflected in section 13 of 
the current draft [2].   Recommend move to PENDING_REVIEW

ISSUE-30  Declaring relations between cubes (bad summary)

Discussed on list thread [3]. No disagreement with postponing. Note 
added to spec about possibility of future extensions to support this 
(section 10.4 [4]).         Recommend moving to POSTPONED.

ISSUE-31   Supporting aggregation for other than SKOS hierarchies

Discussed on list thread [5] and [10]. Compromise reached with the 
introduction of qb:HierarchicalCodeList, qb:hierarchyRoot and 
qb:parentChildProperty. Described in revised section 10.3 [6]. Recommend 
moving this to PENDING_REVIEW and then to CLOSED once Richard and 
Benedikt are happy with it.

ISSUE-32   Relationship to ISO19156 - Observations & Measurements?	

Proposal to write information note on this as part of the Data Cube 
requirements document. Should remain OPEN.

ISSUE-33  Collections of observations and well-formedness of slices	

Discussed on list starting with thread [7]. Solution reached with 
introduction of qb:ObservationGroup and qb:observationGroup. Described 
at end of section 9 of the spec [8]. Recommend CLOSE.

ISSUE-34 Clarify or drop qb:subslice ?

Discussed on list starting thread [9]. While Benedikt has a reasonable 
use case, Richard and I felt that given the limited time available to 
resolve the problems it was better to remove this. It can always be 
reintroduced in a future extension. Removal done. Recommend CLOSE.

ISSUE-37 Align Data Cube with SDMX 2.1

This remains OPEN for now. If Richard is able to deal with it in the 
time available then that would be wonderful. Otherwise move to POSTPONED.

ISSUE-39 Allow skos:Collections as value of qb:codeList

Discussed on thread [10]. Handled by generalizing range of qb:codeList. 
Recommend CLOSE.

ACTION-30	pending review	Produce editor's draft of Data Cube spec 
Richard Cyganiak	2012-02-01	Data Cube Vocabulary

Obsolete, recommend CLOSE.

ACTION-42	pending review	Update 
http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/Data_Cube_Vocabulary	Richard Cyganiak 
2012-02-02	Data Cube Vocabulary

Obsolete, recommend CLOSE.

ACTION-56	open	Address QB feedback from Curran	Richard Cyganiak 
2012-03-04	Data Cube Vocabulary

This feedback was all dealt with some time ago. Recommend CLOSE.

ACTION-63	open	Improve SDMX references	Dave Reynolds	2012-04-27	Data 
Cube Vocabulary

Done, request CLOSE.

ACTION-64	open	Provide informative references to COG RDF schemes

Done, request CLOSE.


[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Feb/0106.html

[2] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/data-cube/index.html#wf

[3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Feb/0085.html


[5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Feb/0097.html


[7] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Feb/0087.html
Some replies are not correctly linked to the thread in the mail archives.

[8] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/data-cube/index.html#slices

[9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Feb/0084.html
Some replies are not correctly linked to the thread in the mail archives.

[10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Mar/0008.html
Received on Tuesday, 5 March 2013 15:04:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:52:06 UTC