- From: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 15:08:08 +0000
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- CC: Government Linked Data Working Group <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
Hi Richard, Still working through the details of this. I have some questions over: On 02/03/13 19:30, Richard Cyganiak wrote: > qb:order on components within a dataset must be consecutive integers starting with 1 Do you regard qb:order as mandatory? In the current text we say "may be ordered by ..." so I have always regarded this as optional. Which makes this check odd. In other applications where I have an ordering predicate I've generally found it preferable to allow orderings to be sparse, makes them easier to manage. I'd like to propose that the only well-formedness check on qb:order be that they must be integers (which is already implied by the datatype checking). Dave
Received on Monday, 4 March 2013 15:08:43 UTC