- From: Fadi Maali <fadi.maali@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 13:34:18 +0100
- To: Makx Dekkers <mail@makxdekkers.com>
- Cc: Public GLD WG <public-gld-wg@w3.org>, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
Hi Makx, Thanks for the comment and for proposing text for clarifying properties descriptions. Here is the list of changes I plan to deploy to the document, please let me know if you think they are sufficient (I think I can not apply them to the Spec now): 1. change accessURL description to the text you suggested: A landing page, feed, SPARQL endpoint or other type of resource that gives access to the distribution of the dataset 2. remove "the value is a URL" from the usage note from both downloadURL and accessURL 3. add "Use accessURL, and not downloadURL, when it is definitely not a download or when you are not sure whether it is." to the accessURL usage note 4. change downloadURL description to the text you proposed: A file that contains the distribution of the dataset in a given format Best, Fadi -------------------------------------------------- Fadi Maali PhD student @ DERI Irish Research Council Embark Scholarship holder http://www.deri.ie/users/fadi-maali On 31 Jul 2013, at 13:07, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: > Just a quick chime in. Text can be clarified after Last Call as long as the meaning doesn't change - and this discussion sounds like a call for clarity without changing the meaning. > > Fadi - can I encourage you to log Makx's comment as a Last Call comment (which will need a reply and, ideally, a signal from Makx that he's happy with that reply). > > Phil. > > On 31/07/2013 08:16, Makx Dekkers wrote: >>> >>> However, regarding defining the range as a literal typed as >> xdd:anyURI, >>> I don't agree. >>> dcat:accessURL is used to refer to a mechanism through which the data >>> can be accessed. This mechanism can be an API that can be represented >>> as a rdfs:Resource that needs to be described with further properties. >>> >> >> My suggestion was just to align the text with the range of >> rdfs:Resource. >> >> I would be very much against changing the range of the properties at >> this stage. The DCAT Application Profile that we have just finalised >> relies on the range of these two properties to be rdfs:Resource. >> >> Makx. >> >> >> > > -- > > Phil Archer > W3C eGovernment > > http://philarcher.org > +44 (0)7887 767755 > @philarcher1
Received on Wednesday, 31 July 2013 12:34:46 UTC