- From: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 10:06:04 +0000
- To: public-gld-wg@w3.org
Hi Benedikt, Aiming for a Working Group Note seems appropriate, good plan. I haven't had a chance to do a review of the current state of the document to be able to vote on whether it is ready to go. Dave On 28/02/13 00:42, Benedikt Kaempgen wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I have updated our Editor's Draft for the Data Cube Use Case Document [1]. > > The document reflects the current status of the vocabulary, including the issues in the tracker, and does not raise new requirements. Rather the document serves as an illustration and documentation of the design decisions for the recommendation. > > I have discussed it with Richard and would like to suggest to publish this version as a Working Group Note. > > I have checked the document with Pubrules [2] and there are only 3 issues left where I do not have enough experience to know what exactly to do. > > It would be great to hear your opinion about publishing the document as a note. > > Best, > > Benedikt > > [1] <https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/data-cube-ucr/data-cube-ucr-20130227/index.html> > > [2] <http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules?uimode=checker_full&uri=https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/data-cube-ucr/data-cube-ucr-20130227/index.html> > >
Received on Thursday, 28 February 2013 10:06:37 UTC