- From: Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:19:01 +0100
- To: Dave Reynolds <dave@epimorphics.com>
- CC: Government Linked Data Working Group <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
Hi Dave,
Please help me to understand this issue..I don't really get the point.
> As raised by Eric inhttp://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Feb/0045.html PROV-O includes a prov:Organization.
>
> Should ORG now declare and explicit relationship between org:Organization and prov:Organization?
Org makes explicit relationship with foaf as here:
(1) [[ org:Organization a owl:Class, rdfs:Class;
rdfs:subClassOf foaf:Agent;
owl:equivalentClass foaf:Organization;
rdfs:label "Organization"@en;
]]
While in PROV-O, there is no explicit relationship with
foaf:Organization nor foaf:Agent
(2) [[
prov:Organization
a owl:Class ;
rdfs:isDefinedBy <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> ;
rdfs:label "Organization" ;
rdfs:subClassOf prov:Agent ;
]]
Looking at the spec, they do not mention such relationship.
So, why do ORG be so explicit with PROV-O?
Do PROV-O also consider having explicit relationship with for e.g.
foaf:Organization.
> Should that be owl:equivalentClass or just rdfs:subClassOf?
Sorry if I don't understand this issue.
Thanks for any clarification on this issue.
Best,
Ghislain
--
Ghislain Atemezing
EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
Campus SophiaTech
450, route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France.
e-mail: auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr & ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8178
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~atemezin
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 13:19:29 UTC