- From: Ghislain Atemezing <auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:19:01 +0100
- To: Dave Reynolds <dave@epimorphics.com>
- CC: Government Linked Data Working Group <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
Hi Dave, Please help me to understand this issue..I don't really get the point. > As raised by Eric inhttp://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Feb/0045.html PROV-O includes a prov:Organization. > > Should ORG now declare and explicit relationship between org:Organization and prov:Organization? Org makes explicit relationship with foaf as here: (1) [[ org:Organization a owl:Class, rdfs:Class; rdfs:subClassOf foaf:Agent; owl:equivalentClass foaf:Organization; rdfs:label "Organization"@en; ]] While in PROV-O, there is no explicit relationship with foaf:Organization nor foaf:Agent (2) [[ prov:Organization a owl:Class ; rdfs:isDefinedBy <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> ; rdfs:label "Organization" ; rdfs:subClassOf prov:Agent ; ]] Looking at the spec, they do not mention such relationship. So, why do ORG be so explicit with PROV-O? Do PROV-O also consider having explicit relationship with for e.g. foaf:Organization. > Should that be owl:equivalentClass or just rdfs:subClassOf? Sorry if I don't understand this issue. Thanks for any clarification on this issue. Best, Ghislain -- Ghislain Atemezing EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department Campus SophiaTech 450, route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France. e-mail: auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr & ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8178 Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200 Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~atemezin
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 13:19:29 UTC