- From: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 08:45:50 +0000
- To: Eric Stephan <ericphb@gmail.com>
- CC: W3C public GLD WG WG <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
Hi Eric, >>> 2.4 Organizational History (non-normative) > >> >> OPMV has essentially been superseded by PROV-O, ORG used to link to OMPV, >> now it links to PROV-O and there's no OPMV terms mentioned in the ontology. > > --> -1. OPMV is among many provenance vocabularies will continue to > exist even after W3C PROV simply because many services, tools, and > APIs in production today. Because the fact that other non-W3C > provenance vocabularies aren't mentioned here I suggest just > mentioning the W3C PROV. I guess I was talking from the narrow perspective of ORG. In ORG we used to link to OPMV, the WG decided we should change that to PROV-O, hence the non-normative comment. I'm happy to accept that OPMV usage will continue in the wider world. Is there some specific change in the spec document that you think is needed here? It sounds like you are suggesting we remove even the "informative" comment about OPMV. I would be reluctant to do that give that ORG use pre-dates the OPMV/PROV-O switch but if that's needed in order to get to convergence then I guess I'd go along with it. Dave
Received on Tuesday, 19 February 2013 08:46:40 UTC