Re: Issues with ReSpec editor's drafts on Chrome, with fix

Thanks Richard!
The BP editor's draft is updated with your fix.

@Dave thanks for fixing the mercurial repos.

Best

Boris



On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Bernadette Hyland <bhyland@3roundstones.com
> wrote:

> Thanks Richard, I'll make these changes to the BP doc and contact you if I
> have any questions.  Thanks for sharing.
>
> Cheers,
> Bernadette
>
> On Jan 31, 2013, at 3:08 PM, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> wrote:
>
> ACTION REQUIRED for all editors of documents that use ReSpec!
>
> There is an issue with the way we used ReSpec in at least *some* of our
> Editor's Drafts, including the DCAT spec. When you access the drafts in
> Chrome, they show up as raw unstyled documents, without any of the ReSpec
> stuff applied. To fix this in the DCAT spec, I added a copy of the latest
> ReSpec to our Mercurial repository, and made the following changes in the
> HTML header (removed lines starting with "-", added lines starting with
> "+"):
>
>  <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
>  <!--[if lt IE 9]>
>  <script src="http://www.w3.org/2008/site/js/html5shiv.js"></script>
>  <![endif]-->
> - <script type="text/javascript" src="
> http://dev.w3.org/2009/dap/ReSpec.js/js/respec.js"
> class="remove"></script>
> + <script type="text/javascript"
> src='../respec/respec3/builds/respec-w3c-common.js' class='remove'></script>
>  <script type="text/javascript" src="respec-ref.js"
> class="remove"></script>
>  <script type="text/javascript" src="../respec/gld-bib.js"
> class="remove"></script>
>  <script type="text/javascript" src="respec-config.js"
> class="remove"></script>
> - <script type="text/javascript"  src="../respec/gld-config.js"
> class="remove"></script>
>
> Editors of all documents that use ReSpec should make the same changes.
>
> Best,
> Richard
>
>
>