Re: PLEASE VOTE on publishing BP

My apologies for being late. I've been traveling for the organization
of the W3C Day in Spain yesterday.

+1 to publish it.

Best,

Martin


On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:
> Summary: should we go ahead and publish bp as it stands today?   vote asap.
>
> Following the emails of yesterday [1] [2], there's been some disagreement
> about whether it might still be possible to publish Best Practices.   The
> chairs have agreed to hold an email vote this week; deadline is the end of
> the usual meeting time (about 26 hours from when I'm sending this).     If
> you have a problem with this deadline, please say so, but we don't have a
> lot of options.   We wont physically be able to publish until January, so if
> you have a procedural complain in the next two weeks, there will be time to
> consider it.
>
> There will be an informal meeting, at the usual time tomorrow, during which
> people can discuss BP if they want, but the email votes will be what counts.
>
> The document under consideration is here (frozen):
>
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/4dbafa673d70/bp/index.html
>
> and the diff from Friday's version is here:
>
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/bp/diff-1213-1218.html
>
> Please respond via email with a vote (+1 if you support, 0 abstain, -1
> formal objection, in between to show nuance if you want) on the proposal
> below.   If you would vote higher with some small edit, please provide the
> edit and we'll try to see if there's email consensus for it.   Feel free to
> make other statements, but please keep it brief.   If anyone votes -1 or if
> only a few people vote +1, the document will be left unpublished (but still
> in its current location on the web).
>
> PROPOSED: Publish
> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/4dbafa673d70/bp/index.html, with minimal
> edits necessary to make it pubrules compliant and fix simple typos.    We
> believe that the document in its current form expresses Best Practices for
> publishing Government Linked Data.   We understand it might be updated by
> another group in the future or might remain as-is.
>
> Thank you for your prompt response.
>
>        -- Sandro (in consultation with the chairs & Phil)
>
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Dec/0069.html
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Dec/0071.html etc



-- 
Martin Alvarez-Espinar
CTIC Centro Tecnológico
martin.alvarez@fundacionctic.org
C/ Ada Byron, 39 Parque Científico y Tecnológico
33203 Gijon-Asturias-Spain
Telf: +34984291212 - Fax: +34984390612
www.fundacionctic.org

Received on Thursday, 19 December 2013 16:54:53 UTC