Re: PLEASE VOTE on publishing BP

+1 to publish the document

Christophe


On 19 December 2013 01:36, Daniel Vila <dvila@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es> wrote:

> +1 to publishing the BP document.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Daniel Vila
>
>
> 2013/12/19 Boris Villazón-Terrazas <boris.villazon@terrazas.name>
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> +1 to publish the Best Practices for Publishing Linked Data, aimed at
>> government content.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>>>  Summary: should we go ahead and publish bp as it stands today?   vote
>>> asap.
>>>
>>> Following the emails of yesterday [1] [2], there's been some
>>> disagreement about whether it might still be possible to publish Best
>>> Practices.   The chairs have agreed to hold an email vote this week;
>>> deadline is the end of the usual meeting time (about 26 hours from when I'm
>>> sending this).     If you have a problem with this deadline, please say so,
>>> but we don't have a lot of options.   We wont physically be able to publish
>>> until January, so if you have a procedural complain in the next two weeks,
>>> there will be time to consider it.
>>>
>>> There will be an informal meeting, at the usual time tomorrow, during
>>> which people can discuss BP if they want, but the email votes will be what
>>> counts.
>>>
>>> The document under consideration is here (frozen):
>>>
>>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/4dbafa673d70/bp/index.html
>>>
>>> and the diff from Friday's version is here:
>>>
>>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/bp/diff-1213-1218.html
>>>
>>> Please respond via email with a vote (+1 if you support, 0 abstain, -1
>>> formal objection, in between to show nuance if you want) on the proposal
>>> below.   If you would vote higher with some small edit, please provide the
>>> edit and we'll try to see if there's email consensus for it.   Feel free to
>>> make other statements, but please keep it brief.   If anyone votes -1 or if
>>> only a few people vote +1, the document will be left unpublished (but still
>>> in its current location on the web).
>>>
>>> *PROPOSED: Publish*
>>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/4dbafa673d70/bp/index.html, with
>>> minimal edits necessary to make it pubrules compliant and fix simple
>>> typos.    We believe that the document in its current form expresses Best
>>> Practices for publishing Government Linked Data.   We understand it might
>>> be updated by another group in the future or might remain as-is.
>>>
>>> Thank you for your prompt response.
>>>
>>>        -- Sandro (in consultation with the chairs & Phil)
>>>
>>> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Dec/0069.html
>>> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Dec/0071.htmletc
>>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
Onderzoeker
+31(0)6 14576494
christophe.gueret@dans.knaw.nl

*Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)*
DANS bevordert duurzame toegang tot digitale onderzoeksgegevens. Kijk op
www.dans.knaw.nl voor meer informatie. DANS is een instituut van KNAW en
NWO.

Let op, per 1 januari hebben we een nieuw adres:
DANS | Anna van Saksenlaan 51 | 2593 HW Den Haag | Postbus 93067 | 2509 AB
Den Haag | +31 (0)70 349 44 50 | info@dans.knaw.nl | www.dans.knaw.nl

*Mede namens mijn collega's wens ik u fijne feestdagen. We hopen dat 2014
net zo'n datarijk jaar wordt als de voorgaande jaren.*

*Let's build a World Wide Semantic Web!*
http://worldwidesemanticweb.org/

*e-Humanities Group (KNAW)*
http://ehumanities.nl/