Re: PLEASE VOTE on publishing BP

+1 to publishing the BP document.

Cheers,

Daniel Vila


2013/12/19 Boris Villazón-Terrazas <boris.villazon@terrazas.name>

> Hi all
>
> +1 to publish the Best Practices for Publishing Linked Data, aimed at
> government content.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:
>
>>  Summary: should we go ahead and publish bp as it stands today?   vote
>> asap.
>>
>> Following the emails of yesterday [1] [2], there's been some disagreement
>> about whether it might still be possible to publish Best Practices.   The
>> chairs have agreed to hold an email vote this week; deadline is the end of
>> the usual meeting time (about 26 hours from when I'm sending this).     If
>> you have a problem with this deadline, please say so, but we don't have a
>> lot of options.   We wont physically be able to publish until January, so
>> if you have a procedural complain in the next two weeks, there will be time
>> to consider it.
>>
>> There will be an informal meeting, at the usual time tomorrow, during
>> which people can discuss BP if they want, but the email votes will be what
>> counts.
>>
>> The document under consideration is here (frozen):
>>
>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/4dbafa673d70/bp/index.html
>>
>> and the diff from Friday's version is here:
>>
>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/bp/diff-1213-1218.html
>>
>> Please respond via email with a vote (+1 if you support, 0 abstain, -1
>> formal objection, in between to show nuance if you want) on the proposal
>> below.   If you would vote higher with some small edit, please provide the
>> edit and we'll try to see if there's email consensus for it.   Feel free to
>> make other statements, but please keep it brief.   If anyone votes -1 or if
>> only a few people vote +1, the document will be left unpublished (but still
>> in its current location on the web).
>>
>> *PROPOSED: Publish*
>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/4dbafa673d70/bp/index.html, with
>> minimal edits necessary to make it pubrules compliant and fix simple
>> typos.    We believe that the document in its current form expresses Best
>> Practices for publishing Government Linked Data.   We understand it might
>> be updated by another group in the future or might remain as-is.
>>
>> Thank you for your prompt response.
>>
>>        -- Sandro (in consultation with the chairs & Phil)
>>
>> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Dec/0069.html
>> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2013Dec/0071.htmletc
>>
>
>