- From: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:41:14 +0100
- To: James McKinney <james@opennorth.ca>
- CC: Government Linked Data Working Group <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
True. That's historical, originally only FormalOrganizations had units but that restriction was removed long before ORG reached W3C. I've fixed the diagram. Dave On 17/10/12 16:01, James McKinney wrote: > Thanks, Dave. One last thing: in the diagram, the hasUnit and unitOf properties are only shown to link a FormalOrganization and an OrganizationalUnit, but these properties can link Organization and any of its subclasses to an OrganizationalUnit. Is there a source version of the image that I can work with to try and find a solution that doesn't add too much clutter? > > On 2012-10-17, at 10:18 AM, Dave Reynolds wrote: > >> I have updated the ORG document to reflect the editorial suggestions from James [1][2], thanks for the comments. >> >> I have generated a new static snapshot. So the updated draft at [3], now dated 17 October 2012, is the proposed text for the last call vote on Thursday. >> >> I have also added Ghislain's translations to the published ontology itself, thanks Ghislain. >> >> Dave >> >> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2012Oct/0045.html >> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-gld-wg/2012Oct/0064.html >> [3] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/org/static.html >> >
Received on Wednesday, 17 October 2012 15:41:50 UTC