Re: ADMS high level comments

On 2012-10-12, at 3:41 AM, Phil Archer wrote:

> I will be able to spend more time on ADMS next week (not today - deadline looming). But just a quick note to answer your point, James - the spec doc defines the concepts, not the RDF realisation of them. The actual schema (which needs updating a little) is at and is uses a lot of dcterms, just like DCAT. It defines very few classes and properties in its own namespace. An XML schema also exists in the original EU publication too.

Should this WG be reviewing now, or is that out of scope / does that come up later?

Received on Friday, 12 October 2012 14:18:19 UTC