Re: ORG: proposed Last Call draft for review

On 01/10/12 11:23, Richard Cyganiak wrote:
> On 1 Oct 2012, at 09:58, Dave Reynolds wrote:
>> (2) ORG has a couple of references to the OPMV vocabulary. I considered whether these should be changed to use PROV-O [1]. Technically that would be easy, for those parts used in ORG then PROV-O is basically the same as OPMV except for names. However, PROV-O is still at WD stage so if we made that a dependency we would be blocked waiting for PROV-O to proceed.  When PROV-O is published it seems likely that someone will provide mappings between it and OPMV, in which case our use of OPMV would automatically be compatible with PROV-O.
> PROV-O is in Last Call, and its LC feedback period has in fact already ended.

Ah, sorry my mistake.

> It might be worth asking PROV-WG for an estimate of the next publication date, and whether that's likely to be another WD or a CR.

Guidance from chairs & Sandro please.

Would it be preferable to try switching to using the W3C vocabulary?

If so do we have a liaison or should I just contact them via the public 
comments list?


Received on Monday, 1 October 2012 10:35:47 UTC