- From: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2012 08:39:57 +0000
- To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- CC: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, public-gld-wg@w3.org
On 07/03/12 06:01, Michael Hausenblas wrote: > >> For "org" and "people", I'm inclined to go with vocab-org and >> vocab-people. I think http://www.w3.org/TR/people suggests a somewhat >> larger scope than this document has. > > > +1 for vocab-people etc. - looks sensible and scalable to me. +1 >> The one aspect of >> this that's not a coin flip, I think, is whether to put the word >> "government" and the letter "g" in the title. I lean slightly against >> it, because I think it would scare away some people who would find the >> document useful, but that's just my relatively uninformed opinion. > > We're chartered for GLD. Our prime 'customers' are government agency. > Let's be honest and stick with what/who we are. Don't get me wrong - I > love the idea that the stuff we write is reusable and in a sense > applicable to other domains, but I think we're sending out the wrong > message. I fear that in an attempt to maximise potential reuse down the > line we fail to show respect and dedication towards our main audience: > governments. +1, the best practice document should include "gld" or similar in the shortname. My personal pick would be gld-best-practice but have no very strong preference. Dave
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2012 08:40:33 UTC