Re: Notes on academic/non-commercial software for procurement section

Thanks Richard for this useful addition.  

The best fit may be with the checklist we discussed in relation to vocabs, but as you rightly point out should be considered WRT to tools too.  I'm massage into declarative checklist items and ask you to review to ensure people can evaluate the risks appropriately.  Thanks again for the contribution.



On Feb 11, 2012, at 9:08 AM, Richard Cyganiak wrote:

> I've added a brain dump on the use of academic and other non-commercial software:
> Editors of the Procurement section, please use (or don't) as you see fit.
> This completes ACTION-25.
> All the best,
> Richard

Received on Monday, 13 February 2012 15:48:09 UTC