- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:06:41 +0000
- To: W3C GLD <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
Thanks, Ivan! Cheers, Michael -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html Begin forwarded message: > From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org> > Date: 10 February 2012 15:56:53 GMT > To: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org> > Cc: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, Government Linked Data Working Group > WG <public-gld-wg@w3.org> > Subject: Re: ISSUE-12 (valuesForDataFormat): What values to use to > describe formats of dcat:Distribution? [DCAT] > > If the file formats are really properly defined then yes, this can > be used. I am not sure how this answers Phil's issue with dbpedia, > though. But I probably miss the background here. > > Ivan > > > > On Feb 10, 2012, at 16:50 , Michael Hausenblas wrote: > >> >> I wonder if we can mint something over in http://www.w3.org/ns/formats/ >> - Ivan? >> >> Cheers, >> Michael >> -- >> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow >> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre >> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute >> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway >> Ireland, Europe >> Tel. +353 91 495730 >> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ >> http://sw-app.org/about.html >> >> On 10 Feb 2012, at 15:19, Phil Archer wrote: >> >>> I'm getting some push-back from gov data publishers on using >>> DBpedia sadly (it's third party, it's not real, it's not stable, >>> not like all our wonderful government department Web sites that >>> sometimes stay on line for whole months!). The PROMOM effort that >>> Dave has highlighted looks like the kind of thing they'd like more >>> - government agency to government agency - as long as there's no >>> ".uk" anywhere in the URIs I guess. >>> >>> How about "use a stable URI scheme for file formats if available, >>> falling back to the MIME type if not available" ? >>> >>> Phil. >>> >>> >>> >>> On 10/02/2012 15:06, John Erickson wrote: >>>>>> The Right Thing to do would be to get IETF to mint URIs for all >>>>>> media >>>>>> types, and get ESRI to register a media type for their file >>>>>> format, etc. >>>>>> This may not be feasible. >>>> >>>> ...or maybe we could just follow the same, de facto convention >>>> we've >>>> been following of using URIs from A Certain Third party: >>>> >>>> http://dbpedia.org/resource/TIFF >>>> http://dbpedia.org/resource/JPEG >>>> http://dbpedia.org/resource/GZIP >>>> >>>> ...etc. ;) >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> Phil Archer >>> W3C eGovernment >>> http://www.w3.org/egov/ >>> >>> http://philarcher.org >>> +44 (0)7887 767755 >>> @philarcher1 >>> >> > > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > >
Received on Friday, 10 February 2012 16:07:10 UTC