- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 15:50:22 +0000
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>, Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: Government Linked Data Working Group WG <public-gld-wg@w3.org>
I wonder if we can mint something over in http://www.w3.org/ns/ formats/ - Ivan? Cheers, Michael -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel. +353 91 495730 http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ http://sw-app.org/about.html On 10 Feb 2012, at 15:19, Phil Archer wrote: > I'm getting some push-back from gov data publishers on using DBpedia > sadly (it's third party, it's not real, it's not stable, not like > all our wonderful government department Web sites that sometimes > stay on line for whole months!). The PROMOM effort that Dave has > highlighted looks like the kind of thing they'd like more - > government agency to government agency - as long as there's no ".uk" > anywhere in the URIs I guess. > > How about "use a stable URI scheme for file formats if available, > falling back to the MIME type if not available" ? > > Phil. > > > > On 10/02/2012 15:06, John Erickson wrote: >>>> The Right Thing to do would be to get IETF to mint URIs for all >>>> media >>>> types, and get ESRI to register a media type for their file >>>> format, etc. >>>> This may not be feasible. >> >> ...or maybe we could just follow the same, de facto convention we've >> been following of using URIs from A Certain Third party: >> >> http://dbpedia.org/resource/TIFF >> http://dbpedia.org/resource/JPEG >> http://dbpedia.org/resource/GZIP >> >> ...etc. ;) >> > > -- > > > Phil Archer > W3C eGovernment > http://www.w3.org/egov/ > > http://philarcher.org > +44 (0)7887 767755 > @philarcher1 >
Received on Friday, 10 February 2012 15:50:52 UTC