Re: Some errata, http://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-org/

Thanks Phil for that specific guidance. DaveR let us know if you're willing to make this change.

Cheers,
Bernadette Hyland

On Jan 23, 2014, at 10:23, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote:

> Dave, everyone,
> 
> I'm pleased to say that this can be resolved relatively easily.
> 
> Fixing the turtle file is easy - it can just be 'done' since we're not deleting a term, restricting its meaning etc.
> 
> Fixing the Rec is harder since that doc cannot be edited so the mechanism for this kind of thing is to record an erratum, in this case at http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/Org_Errata which is linked from the (frozen) document.
> 
> Dave - are you happy to take care of this please? An error for which I am entirely responsible might provide a useful template for what's required:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2007/powder/powder-errata#describedby
> 
> And when you edit the .ttl file, please be sure to update your copy from CVS as I've added the Italian since you last touched it.
> 
> Thanks again Kārlis. It's worth recording here that this error came to light using the ontology visualisation and editing tool OWLGrEd http://owlgred.lumii.lv/ - I'm looking forward to taking that conversation/service forward!
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Phil.
> 
> 
> On 22/01/2014 14:57, Dave Reynolds wrote:
>> Hi Kārlis,
>> 
>> Thank you for spotting these issues...
>> 
>> On 22/01/2014 12:23, Kārlis Čerāns wrote:
>>> 1. It seems that there might be a problem with the axiom
>>> 
>>> subPropertyOf(org:holds org:memberOf)
>>> 
>>> since the range of org:holds is org:Post and the range of org:memberOf
>>> is org:Organization
>>> 
>>> (in effect, only those posts can be held that are also organizations).
>>> 
>>> The same problem is reflected also by the axiom subPropertyOf(org:heldBy
>>> org:hasMember).
>> 
>> Agreed that is an errata with the document. It is a hang over from a
>> previous draft in which Posts were treated as Organizations. When that
>> was removed those subProperyOf axioms should have been removed from the
>> document and the ontology.
>> 
>> I'm sorry this wasn't spotted earlier!
>> 
>> Since the Working Group has now finished I'm not sure what the W3C
>> process is for tracking and eventually correctly this errata.
>> 
>>> 2. There are apparently incorrect specifications
>>>     rdfs:domain foaf:Agent;
>>>     rdfs:range  foaf:Agent;
>>> for org:reportsTo in the referred namespace http://www.w3.org/ns/org#
>>> (the correct domain and range specifications are given there, as well):
>>>     rdfs:domain [a owl:Class; owl:unionOf (foaf:Agent org:Post)];
>>>     rdfs:range  [a owl:Class; owl:unionOf (foaf:Agent org:Post)];
>> 
>> That looks like a merge error in updating the ontology file. The unionOf
>> is correct, correctly given in the specification and included in the
>> ontology. I'm pretty sure the old domain/range axioms were deleted at
>> one point, I wonder how they reappeared?
>> 
>> This merge error can simply be corrected in the ontology file with no
>> impact on the specification. I will fix this when I'm back on a machine
>> with suitable access.
>> 
>> Dave
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> 
> Phil Archer
> W3C Data Activity Lead
> http://www.w3.org/2013/data/
> 
> http://philarcher.org
> +44 (0)7887 767755
> @philarcher1
> 

Received on Thursday, 23 January 2014 16:19:59 UTC