Re: [QB] Implementation report

Thanks Dave.

I acknowledge the state of things from the WG's perspective. The primary 
reason for submitting was for future documentation or benefit. I'd like 
to think that our work extends the start and end dates of a particular 
community.

-Sarven

On 12/06/2013 11:01 PM, Dave Reynolds wrote:
> Hi Sarven,
>
> Many thanks for the report.
>
> Now we have voted to seek transition to PR things should technically be
> frozen. However, I see no harm in squeezing in one last implementation
> report so I've done that.
>
> Dave
>
> On 06/12/13 13:29, Sarven Capadisli wrote:
>> I would like report a Data Cube implementation.
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/validator/qb/qb-test?upload=upload-2013-12-06T13-24-45-66
>>
>>
>>
>> Failed 1
>>
>> Failed 4
>>
>> Failed 8
>>
>>
>> IC1 and 4 are not important here. I was trying to fail IC8 and it fails
>> correctly. I created a sample where SliceKey's componentProperties are
>> not listed in DSD's componentProperties.
>>
>> -Sarven
>>
>
>

Received on Saturday, 7 December 2013 09:47:24 UTC