- From: Dave Reynolds <dave.e.reynolds@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2013 15:30:58 +0000
- To: public-gld-comments@w3.org
Hi Sarven, Absolutely, getting a recommendation out (assuming we made it that far) will only be the start and examples of practice are always going to be useful. Didn't mean in any way to put you off continuing to evaluate and share results. I just need to be sensitive to keeping the package of information we are asking people to assess for transition meeting stable. Cheers, Dave On 07/12/13 09:46, Sarven Capadisli wrote: > Thanks Dave. > > I acknowledge the state of things from the WG's perspective. The primary > reason for submitting was for future documentation or benefit. I'd like > to think that our work extends the start and end dates of a particular > community. > > -Sarven > > On 12/06/2013 11:01 PM, Dave Reynolds wrote: >> Hi Sarven, >> >> Many thanks for the report. >> >> Now we have voted to seek transition to PR things should technically be >> frozen. However, I see no harm in squeezing in one last implementation >> report so I've done that. >> >> Dave >> >> On 06/12/13 13:29, Sarven Capadisli wrote: >>> I would like report a Data Cube implementation. >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2011/gld/validator/qb/qb-test?upload=upload-2013-12-06T13-24-45-66 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Failed 1 >>> >>> Failed 4 >>> >>> Failed 8 >>> >>> >>> IC1 and 4 are not important here. I was trying to fail IC8 and it fails >>> correctly. I created a sample where SliceKey's componentProperties are >>> not listed in DSD's componentProperties. >>> >>> -Sarven >>> >> >> > >
Received on Saturday, 7 December 2013 15:31:27 UTC