Re: person instead of agent

On ven., 2013-12-06 at 22:21 +0000, Dave Reynolds wrote:
> > If that is indeed so, I suggest avoiding to use the word "person"; this
> > probably applies to other description in the spec (e.g. hasMember).
> > 5.3.4 seems to already make the distinction properly though.
> 
> I agree that would be a useful editorial clarification.
> 
> Technically the documents are now frozen since have made the final 
> decision to seek transition to PR. However, since we have only just done 
> that and this is such a small but useful editorial change I think it is 
> reasonable to make it. So I have done so [1][2].
> 
> Please could you confirm that you are happy with this response.

Absolutely, thanks!

Dom

Received on Saturday, 7 December 2013 06:46:07 UTC