Re: Geofencing API - next steps? from Martin Thomson on 2016-05-20 (public-geolocation@w3.org from May 2016)

From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 14:32:22 -0400
To: "Mandyam, Giridhar" <mandyam@qti.qualcomm.com>
Cc: "public-geolocation@w3.org" <public-geolocation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVxLRC1KpeAg82ob0Sd++n2YUbEa-qQ8A_ztZ-vBvZBhg@mail.gmail.com>

On 19 May 2016 at 10:31, Mandyam, Giridhar <mandyam@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote:
> a)      Transition the existing API to a W3C Note.  This is essentially a
> parking space for a standard that did not achieve completion but could be
> picked up again in the future if there is interest and need.

This seems sufficient.  Adding this work to the sensors work is
probably reasonable, but this group doesn't need to take specific
actions unless the Devices and Sensors group asks.

Received on Friday, 20 May 2016 18:32:50 UTC