Re: Geofencing API - next steps?

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 19 May 2016 at 10:31, Mandyam, Giridhar <mandyam@qti.qualcomm.com>
> wrote:
> > a)      Transition the existing API to a W3C Note.  This is essentially a
> > parking space for a standard that did not achieve completion but could be
> > picked up again in the future if there is interest and need.
>
> This seems sufficient.  Adding this work to the sensors work is
> probably reasonable, but this group doesn't need to take specific
> actions unless the Devices and Sensors group asks.
>

Agreed. That way whatever future direction turns out to be most promising
can be taken (and possibly such future work should happen in the WICG
rather than in any specific working group anyway).

Received on Friday, 20 May 2016 18:51:19 UTC