- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 12:20:59 +0200
- To: "Mandyam, Giridhar" <mandyam@quicinc.com>
- Cc: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>, Chris Palmer <palmer@google.com>, public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Mandyam, Giridhar <mandyam@quicinc.com> wrote: > May I ask why you did not suggest a similar 3-step plan of action for gUM? > It seems like an approach that can be adopted broadly within the W3C for > sensitive API’s. I have suggested they require TLS. So far it is taking a bit more to convince them, but I'm hopeful it will happen. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Sunday, 28 September 2014 10:21:27 UTC