- From: Chris Palmer <palmer@google.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 11:53:19 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Cc: "Mandyam, Giridhar" <mandyam@quicinc.com>, Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>, public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 3:20 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote: >> May I ask why you did not suggest a similar 3-step plan of action for gUM? >> It seems like an approach that can be adopted broadly within the W3C for >> sensitive API’s. > > I have suggested they require TLS. So far it is taking a bit more to > convince them, but I'm hopeful it will happen. Strong Agree. getUserMedia and Geolocation are both great candidates for secure/authenticated* origins only. We should draw up a timeline for phasing it in. * #include <debates/nomenclature.h>
Received on Sunday, 28 September 2014 18:53:46 UTC