- From: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 14:09:44 +0000
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>, Lars Erik Bolstad <lbolstad@opera.com>, public-geolocation@w3.org
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 14:54:36 +0100, Lars Erik Bolstad <lbolstad@opera.com> > wrote: >> >> Sorry for the rather late response here. >> We discussed this at our f2f meeting earlier this week. >> >> We're about to request transition to CR for the DeviceOrientation Events >> spec and from a purely process-related view we're concerned about >> introducing a dependency to DOM4 at this point. >> >> In the interest of wrapping up the work we're chartered to do as a working >> group now and not in 9-12 months, we decided to keep the reference to DOM2 >> Events. > > > FWIW, introducing new init*Event() methods at this stage is not really > acceptable, no matter what the dependency is. And not defining an event > constructor as per DOM also seems questionable, but that is at least > something you could fix in the future. > > Also, you already depend on HTML, which depends on the latest DOM, so it > seems really weird to then also depend on some really crappy out of date > draft. > I think we could remove that dependency. What do you suggest we do? We can't keep this WG going just to wait for DOM4. Thanks, Andrei > > Unrelated, the IDL in http://dev.w3.org/geo/api/spec-source-orientation.html > is out of date. > > > -- > Anne van Kesteren > http://annevankesteren.nl/ >
Received on Thursday, 8 March 2012 14:10:19 UTC