- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:17:18 +0100
- To: "Adrian Bateman" <adrianba@microsoft.com>, "Doug Turner" <dougt@dougt.org>
- Cc: "public-geolocation@w3.org" <public-geolocation@w3.org>
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 16:32:49 +0100, Doug Turner <dougt@dougt.org> wrote: > I'd like the consideration section to reflect the intent we had. I > would rather have us leave the MUST but change what we meant to be > displayed to the user. Maybe "HOST of the requesting document". There > are probably others with a better name for this field. Host is not really good either. You want to know secure versus insecure for instance. Now whether this is displayed as a lock versus http/https should be up to the user agent. In fact, if the user agent comes up with a novel idea to clearly indicate what page the dialog belongs to I think that should be allowed as well. In specifications I have seen to date user interface requirements are never a MUST. A SHOULD is really their upper bound. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 16 November 2010 11:18:00 UTC