Re: Orientation event draft

This draft seems to have a different aim, namely to describe dynamic
information pertaining to a moving body. For example, the Internet-Draft
does not specify or define gamma, the roll of the device (and of course
specifying all three angles requires a more complex definition, e.g.
ordering of angles, etc). Also, the draft's specification of acceleration is
defined in terms of the moving body as opposed to the acceleration exerted
on the body, which is what device accelerometers report.

Dave

On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 12:23 AM, Richard Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com> wrote:

> Please, please, please, keep the data elements document in sync with the
> PIDF-LO extensions for dynamic location:
> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-singh-geopriv-pidf-lo-dynamic>
> They've already done a lot of the work for you, e.g., defining the meaning
> of the various angles.
>
> That document is currently in IESG evaluation, so if you have any comments,
> please submit them ASAP.  In particular, there is discussion right now of
> removing the acceleration fields from the format, so if you want an
> acceleration format, please say so.  You can send comments to <
> geopriv@ietf.org>
>
> Thanks,
> --Richard
>
>
>
>
> On Mar 6, 2010, at 3:31 AM, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>
>  Hello,
>>
>> I have uploaded the first editor's draft of the Orientation Events API:
>>
>> http://dev.w3.org/geo/api/spec-source-orientation.html
>>
>> I would be very grateful if you could review it and send comments.
>> This also completes the following action item:
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2008/geolocation/track/actions/53
>>
>> Matt, Steve Block has kindly volunteered to co-edit this spec with me.
>> Would you be ok with that? If so, I would be grateful if you could
>> help get him set up with CVS access, etc.
>>
>> Many thanks,
>> Andrei
>>
>>
>
>