W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-geolocation@w3.org > March 2009

Re: Intended usage notification

From: Alissa Cooper <acooper@cdt.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 13:11:48 -0400
Cc: "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>, Greg Bolsinga <bolsinga@apple.com>, Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>, public-geolocation@w3.org
Message-Id: <5652A148-C8A7-4C3F-AC02-53673F9D0A43@cdt.org>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
On Mar 26, 2009, at 6:39 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>> - This site just asked me if I wanted to be advertised at based on my
>> location: reject.
> (Why would you reject it? Location-based ads are far more useful than
> generic ads.)

There is a trade-off here that some web users recognize. Receiving a  
location-based ad might be more valuable than a non-location-based ad,  
but some people balance that value against the risk that the site  
would, for example, determine whether the location is a doctor's  
office and sell that fact to health insurers or drug companies, reveal  
the location as part of civil litigation or in response to a  
government subpoena, or hand it off to a rogue employee who abuses it  
(e.g., for stalking). All of these things happen in reality, whether  
with location information or other data exchanged on the web.

This is not a comment on the value of Martin's proposal. I just wanted  
to point out that a value proposition exists here and some web users,  
given the chance, would choose not to share their information even  
when sharing might offer a benefit.
Received on Saturday, 28 March 2009 17:12:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:50:54 UTC