W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-geolocation@w3.org > March 2009

Re: ISSUE-4 (privacy-geopriv): GEOPRIV WG proposal for privacy within the API

From: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:43:50 -0700
Message-Id: <AC77860E-ADE4-40C2-84FD-53920E896D39@gmail.com>
To: Geolocation Working Group WG <public-geolocation@w3.org>
matt, I am confused.

Issue-2:  Sounds like the tracker for the geopriv proposal we voted  
down.  if so, can we close
Issue-4:  Sounds like the same as issue-2.  Is this a dup?

We all have spent dozens of hours on Geopriv.  We voted it down at the  
f2f.  UAs that were present were either on the fence or directly in  
opposition.

Maybe the only real issue that our WG has is to respond to the IETF  
letter, and move on.

Regards,
Doug



On Mar 26, 2009, at 10:33 AM, Geolocation Working Group Issue Tracker  
wrote:

>
> ISSUE-4 (privacy-geopriv): GEOPRIV WG proposal for privacy within  
> the API
>
> http://www.w3.org/2008/geolocation/track/issues/4
>
> Raised by: Matt Womer
> On product:
>
> This issue should be tracked in tracker.  We've had proposals from  
> the IETF GeoPriv working group to include a number of items in the  
> Coordinates object:
>
> * a time after which the location information expires
> * a boolean as to whether the location information can be  
> transmitted to 3rd parties
> * a URL pointing to further policy details
> * a human readable 'noteWell' string
>
> Each of these items has been considered in various forms and  
> discussed at the f2f and via email.
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2009 17:57:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:33:52 UTC