W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-geolocation@w3.org > March 2009

RE: Geolication API level 2 - editor's draft

From: Allan Thomson (althomso) <althomso@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:16:46 -0700
Message-ID: <18B307BFDE5098438B0BF42A4E508FB508015305@xmb-sjc-228.amer.cisco.com>
To: "Doug Turner" <doug.turner@gmail.com>, "Andrei Popescu" <andreip@google.com>
Cc: "public-geolocation" <public-geolocation@w3.org>
I would suggest that it is important to not define rules or constraints
that it make it hard to do 1-1 mapping between Geopriv location object
to this schema. 

Allan

-----Original Message-----
From: public-geolocation-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-geolocation-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Doug Turner
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 2:12 PM
To: Andrei Popescu
Cc: public-geolocation
Subject: Re: Geolication API level 2 - editor's draft

I propose that we move postalCode from its position at the bottom of the
interface, to between "city" and "street".  In this way, the precision
of the location increases with each field.

it is not mentioned, but we should state that each attribute can be
null.

should the zip code be required to be in some sort of format?  An
extended ZIP + 4?  Or should it be freeform?

Doug


On Mar 20, 2009, at 6:16 AM, Andrei Popescu wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have uploaded the first editor's draft for the Geolocation API v2 
>> (or level 2):
>>
>> http://dev.w3.org/geo/api/spec-source-v2.html
>>
>> The main change is the addition of the Address interface.
>
> FYI, here's the diff to v1:
>
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/geo/api/spec-source-v2.html.diff?r1=1.4&r2=1.
> 5&f=h
>
> Andrei
>
Received on Friday, 20 March 2009 21:17:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:33:52 UTC