RE: updated editor's draft of the Geolocation API specification

And I thought we reached an agreement on the updated text and name. None
of which have been adopted.

allan

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrei Popescu [mailto:andreip@google.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 11:02 AM
To: Allan Thomson (althomso)
Cc: Doug Turner; Greg Bolsinga; Lars Erik Bolstad; public-geolocation
Subject: Re: updated editor's draft of the Geolocation API specification

On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Allan Thomson
(althomso)<althomso@cisco.com> wrote:
> Doug - No one is suggesting we write specs that are out-of-date or
> irrelevant to the needs of our customers.
>
> To that point, my original concern around the semantics and usage of
the
> "enableHighAccuracy" attribute still remain and the response to those
> objections seems to be "we already have it so it's ok". That I believe
> is the wrong reason to reject the concerns. A more valid technical
> reason to reject my concerns should be presented by the proponents of
> this attribute.
>

We have both implementations and applications that use the attribute.
I also recall a lengthy discussion about it on this list, with plenty
of use cases and technical reasons.

Thanks,
Andrei

Received on Tuesday, 9 June 2009 18:05:54 UTC