- From: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 19:01:33 +0100
- To: "Allan Thomson (althomso)" <althomso@cisco.com>
- Cc: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>, Greg Bolsinga <bolsinga@apple.com>, Lars Erik Bolstad <lbolstad@opera.com>, public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Allan Thomson (althomso)<althomso@cisco.com> wrote: > Doug - No one is suggesting we write specs that are out-of-date or > irrelevant to the needs of our customers. > > To that point, my original concern around the semantics and usage of the > "enableHighAccuracy" attribute still remain and the response to those > objections seems to be "we already have it so it's ok". That I believe > is the wrong reason to reject the concerns. A more valid technical > reason to reject my concerns should be presented by the proponents of > this attribute. > We have both implementations and applications that use the attribute. I also recall a lengthy discussion about it on this list, with plenty of use cases and technical reasons. Thanks, Andrei
Received on Tuesday, 9 June 2009 18:02:10 UTC