W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-geolocation@w3.org > June 2009

RE: updated editor's draft of the Geolocation API specification

From: Marcin Hanclik <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 14:40:21 +0200
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
CC: Lars Erik Bolstad <lbolstad@opera.com>, public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <FAA1D89C5BAF1142A74AF116630A9F2C0A26ED9297@OBEEX01.obe.access-company.com>
Hi Anne,

Versioning by number (version DOMString) or string (feature DOMString) is still versioning, IMHO.
Do you think Geo 2.0 spec should introduce "geolocation2" object?


Kind regards,

Marcin Hanclik
ACCESS Systems Germany GmbH
Tel: +49-208-8290-6452  |  Fax: +49-208-8290-6465
Mobile: +49-163-8290-646
E-Mail: marcin.hanclik@access-company.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Anne van Kesteren [mailto:annevk@opera.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 2:30 PM
To: Andrei Popescu; Marcin Hanclik
Cc: Lars Erik Bolstad; public-geolocation
Subject: Re: updated editor's draft of the Geolocation API specification

On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:13:15 +0200, Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com> wrote:
> Sure, I think hasFeature() would work. Let's see what the rest of the
> groups says.

Versioning on of APIs for the Web does not work. However, if you really feel you have to do something here the least harm is done by introducing a new string for hasFeature(), indeed. (And it would also consistent with other DOM APIs.)

Anne van Kesteren


Access Systems Germany GmbH
Essener Strasse 5  |  D-46047 Oberhausen
HRB 13548 Amtsgericht Duisburg
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michel Piquemal, Tomonori Watanabe, Yusuke Kanda


This e-mail and any attachments hereto may contain information that is privileged or confidential, and is intended for use only by the
individual or entity to which it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or distribution of the information by anyone else is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this document in error, please notify us promptly by responding to this e-mail. Thank you.
Received on Tuesday, 9 June 2009 12:41:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:50:56 UTC