W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-geolocation@w3.org > June 2009

Re: updated editor's draft of the Geolocation API specification

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:29:46 +0200
To: "Andrei Popescu" <andreip@google.com>, "Marcin Hanclik" <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com>
Cc: "Lars Erik Bolstad" <lbolstad@opera.com>, public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.uu9bnwvh64w2qv@annevk-t60>
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:13:15 +0200, Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com> wrote:
> Sure, I think hasFeature() would work. Let's see what the rest of the
> groups says.

Versioning on of APIs for the Web does not work. However, if you really feel you have to do something here the least harm is done by introducing a new string for hasFeature(), indeed. (And it would also consistent with other DOM APIs.)


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 9 June 2009 12:30:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:50:56 UTC