Re: updated editor's draft of the Geolocation API specification from Andrei Popescu on 2009-06-09 (public-geolocation@w3.org from June 2009)

From: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 13:33:03 +0100
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Cc: Marcin Hanclik <Marcin.Hanclik@access-company.com>, Lars Erik Bolstad <lbolstad@opera.com>, public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>
Message-ID: <708552fb0906090533j575b7377w530925147c32996a@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Anne,

On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Anne van Kesteren<annevk@opera.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:13:15 +0200, Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com> wrote:
>> Sure, I think hasFeature() would work. Let's see what the rest of the
>> groups says.
>
> Versioning on of APIs for the Web does not work. However, if you really feel you have to do something here the least harm is done by introducing a new string for hasFeature(), indeed. (And it would also consistent with other DOM APIs.)
>
>

I don't think it's an issue right now. We can see in V2, depending on
which way the API will evolve.

Thanks,
Andrei

Received on Tuesday, 9 June 2009 12:33:40 UTC