- From: Lars Erik Bolstad <lbolstad@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:20:51 +0200
- To: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>
- CC: Max Froumentin <maxfro@opera.com>, public-geolocation@w3.org
It is overdue. In order for us to proceed to last call we need to close all open issues, of which there are currently three: http://www.w3.org/2008/geolocation/track/issues/open ISSUE-2: Should the Geolocation API include privacy information? This should be closed. We have concluded that the API will not include privacy information. We should focus on ISSUE-5 instead. ISSUE-3: Exposing civic addresses in the API This is for "version 2" of the spec and should not hold up our transition to last call for "version 1". ISSUE-5: What should the Recommendation state about security and privacy considerations? Andrei, could you maybe put your latest draft wording into the editor's draft. I think it looks good. Lars Erik Doug Turner wrote: > on a related note, what is the time frame for the next draft? > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Max Froumentin <maxfro@opera.com > <mailto:maxfro@opera.com>> wrote: > > Hi, > > When you google "w3c geolocation" you get the editor's draft, and > not the published draft. And because the editor's draft doesn't > link to the published one, it can be confusing to find out what > the official W3C status is. Can it be changed so that one links to > the other? > > Cheers, > Max. > >
Received on Friday, 3 April 2009 12:21:37 UTC