- From: Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 13:09:38 +0100
- To: "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>
- Cc: "Allan Thomson (althomso)" <althomso@cisco.com>, Angel Machín <angel.machin@gmail.com>, public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>
Hi Martin, On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 5:21 AM, Thomson, Martin <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com> wrote: > I've said it before... > > It seems like Apple have the right level of abstraction. Specify what result you are looking for and let the device manage the details. CLLocationAccuracy is a double, in metres. No need for any secret understanding of what distinguishes 'true' from 'false'. Just a nice, clear, easy to understand semantic defined in terms that can easily be related to the application. > I feel like we're going in circles here. This has been discussed before and the counter-arguments are nicely explained in the second thread mentioned at http://dev.w3.org/geo/api/spec-source.html#high-accuracy Thanks, Andrei
Received on Friday, 3 April 2009 12:10:16 UTC