Hi Martin, On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 5:21 AM, Thomson, Martin <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com> wrote: > I've said it before... > > It seems like Apple have the right level of abstraction. Specify what result you are looking for and let the device manage the details. CLLocationAccuracy is a double, in metres. No need for any secret understanding of what distinguishes 'true' from 'false'. Just a nice, clear, easy to understand semantic defined in terms that can easily be related to the application. > I feel like we're going in circles here. This has been discussed before and the counter-arguments are nicely explained in the second thread mentioned at http://dev.w3.org/geo/api/spec-source.html#high-accuracy Thanks, AndreiReceived on Friday, 3 April 2009 12:10:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:50:54 UTC