Re: Moving the Geolocation API to First Public Working Draft

On Nov 14, 2008, at 8:44 AM, Richard Barnes wrote:

> Doug,
>
>> Andrei, per our last Monday call, the FPWD should include text that  
>> calls out that the UA is responsible for the privacy of the  
>> Geolocation requests, and that the design of the asynchronous API  
>> allows the implementor to provide such UI.
>
> That wording seems *awfully* vague.  What does it mean for a UA to  
> be "responsible for privacy"?  What are the actions it MUST or  
> SHOULD take?


I think we discussed this already, haven't we?

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-geolocation/2008Nov/0014.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-geolocation/2008Nov/0018.html

Lets let Andrei put together some text so that we can argue about that  
instead of debating the idea of what he might write.

Regards,
Doug Turner

Received on Friday, 14 November 2008 16:52:14 UTC