- From: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:51:34 -0800
- To: Richard Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com>
- Cc: Lars Erik Bolstad <lbolstad@opera.com>, Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>, "Machin, Angel, VF-ES (amachin)" <angel.machin@vodafone.com>, Matt Womer <mdw@w3.org>, public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>
On Nov 14, 2008, at 8:44 AM, Richard Barnes wrote: > Doug, > >> Andrei, per our last Monday call, the FPWD should include text that >> calls out that the UA is responsible for the privacy of the >> Geolocation requests, and that the design of the asynchronous API >> allows the implementor to provide such UI. > > That wording seems *awfully* vague. What does it mean for a UA to > be "responsible for privacy"? What are the actions it MUST or > SHOULD take? I think we discussed this already, haven't we? http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-geolocation/2008Nov/0014.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-geolocation/2008Nov/0018.html Lets let Andrei put together some text so that we can argue about that instead of debating the idea of what he might write. Regards, Doug Turner
Received on Friday, 14 November 2008 16:52:14 UTC