- From: Richard Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:44:56 -0500
- To: Doug Turner <doug.turner@gmail.com>
- CC: Lars Erik Bolstad <lbolstad@opera.com>, Andrei Popescu <andreip@google.com>, "Machin, Angel, VF-ES (amachin)" <angel.machin@vodafone.com>, Matt Womer <mdw@w3.org>, public-geolocation <public-geolocation@w3.org>
Doug, > Andrei, per our last Monday call, the FPWD should include text that > calls out that the UA is responsible for the privacy of the Geolocation > requests, and that the design of the asynchronous API allows the > implementor to provide such UI. That wording seems *awfully* vague. What does it mean for a UA to be "responsible for privacy"? What are the actions it MUST or SHOULD take? --Richard
Received on Friday, 14 November 2008 16:45:44 UTC