- From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2017 01:26:56 +0000
- To: public-fxtf-archive@w3.org
Yes, the default parameter should be completely different from the "value that is equivalent to `none`". Otherwise, there's not much point in having a default parameter. The no-effect values for each filter are only there for interpolation to `none`, and that needs to be clear. The "lacuna value" term was confusing, since elsewhere that term was used for default values. (Also, it's just a confusing, arbitrary jargon term in the first place.) -- GitHub Notification of comment by AmeliaBR Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/fxtf-drafts/issues/1#issuecomment-307270136 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 9 June 2017 01:27:03 UTC