On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > I thought this had been discussed in the past, but I can't find anything > now. Only > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-fx/2014JanMar/0012.html which > isn't asking for non-liveness. > > The only live object is DOMQuad#bounds, I believe. > > https://drafts.fxtf.org/geometry/#associated-bounding-rectangle > > What are the pros and cons for live vs non-live for this object? > If it's not live, would you have an attribute that returns a new object every time, or a method that returns a new object every time, or an attribute (or method) that returns a new object every time the DOMQuad changes, or what? Rob -- lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr rdn rdsme,anea lurpr edna e hnysnenh hhe uresyf toD selthor stor edna siewaoeodm or v sstvr esBa kbvted,t rdsme,aoreseoouoto o l euetiuruewFa kbn e hnystoivateweh uresyf tulsa rehr rdm or rnea lurpr .a war hsrer holsa rodvted,t nenh hneireseoouot.tniesiewaoeivatewt sstvr esn
Received on Tuesday, 17 November 2015 10:48:34 UTC