W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > October to December 2015

Re: [web-animations] Rethinking document.timeline.getAnimations

From: Brian Birtles <bbirtles@mozilla.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 15:32:59 +0900
To: Shane Stephens <shans@google.com>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
Message-ID: <56175F9B.3050106@mozilla.com>
On 2015/10/09 7:51, Shane Stephens wrote:
>     Any thoughts?
> This seems like a really good idea.
> As an extra point - we don't need to solve custom animations (onsample
> effects that modify the document) until L2, so we don't need to think
> about this right now - but if we said that animations without a target
> element belong to the document that the timeline they reference is
> attached to then we might be able to deal with at least simple cases
> here without resorting to exposing the map.

That's a good point. In future timelines won't necessarily be attached 
to a document directly but we can probably define this association in 
terms of the active document when the timeline was created or something 
to that effect.

I'll go ahead and make the change to the spec.

Best regards,

Received on Friday, 9 October 2015 06:33:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:49:54 UTC