- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 16:28:21 -0700
- To: Erik Dahlström <erik@xn--dahlstrm-t4a.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:27 PM, Erik Dahlström <erik@dahlström.net> wrote: > Hi, > I was reviewing the 'transform-box' section in the css transforms spec, > https://drafts.csswg.org/css-transforms/#transform-box. > > The initial value of 'transform-box' is 'border-box', which is fine. > However, the spec continues to state that: > "For SVG elements without an associated CSS layout box, the used value for > border-box is view-box." > > It seems to me that a used value of 'fill-box' in this case would lead to > more easily understood behavior than 'view-box'. So, I'd like to know what > the rationale behind the current choice is. > > An example, http://jsfiddle.net/fs6cLt38/1/. Note that 'fill-box' isn't the correct analogue for border-box, stroke-box is. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 28 September 2015 23:29:11 UTC