- From: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 12:15:13 +0200
- To: public-fx@w3.org
- Cc: simonp@opera.com, dschulze@adobe.com, cabanier@adobe.com
- Message-Id: <201504091215.18003.bert@w3.org>
Here's a request to add http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/WD-matrix-20130919/ as an extra link under "Previous version" in the geometry spec at the next publication. The CSS WG at a meeting last year resolved[1] to republish the old DOMMatrix draft as a NOTE to indicate that it is no longer relevant and that Geometry replaced it. But a little later somebody suggested a better idea: just mention the most recent DOMMatrix draft as a "previous version" in the Geometry draft. No need to publish a NOTE then, because the "latest version" of matrix will link automatically to geometry. Unfortunately, no actions were assigned to anybody and the result is that I stopped working on my action to publish the NOTE I had prepared, but nobody added the previous version link to geometry. I just noticed this today. I didn't want to add the link myself. When I prepared the NOTE for matrix, the editors of geometry looked at it and explicitly said it was fine. When the idea to replace the NOTE by a previous version was discussed, they didn't explicitly say they agreed. I'd like them to either add the link themselves or say explicitly they are OK with it. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Oct/0295.html Bert -- Bert Bos ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/ http://www.w3.org/people/bos W3C/ERCIM bert@w3.org 2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93 +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Thursday, 9 April 2015 10:15:30 UTC