W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-fx@w3.org > October to December 2013

Re: Proposal: feHSL element (was Re: [filter-effects] hue-rotate() and saturate() filters)

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 18:59:39 +0200
Message-ID: <839571999.20131018185939@w3.org>
To: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
CC: Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>, Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>, FX <public-fx@w3.org>
Hello Dirk,

Friday, October 18, 2013, 6:25:29 PM, you wrote:

> Hi Dean and Chris,

> I would like to clarify if you are both on the same side.

> So you both agree that we should have a new feHSL element?

Not speaking for Dino but I do, yes.

> You both agree that his primitive should operate in HSL regardless
> of the specified value of the 'color-interpolation-filters' property?

That is my proposal, yes.

> And you both agree that you do not want to fix hue-rotate() but
> create a new shorthand function for this new operation?

I could go either way on that one. I think the shorthand is more
recent, less widely deployed and there is less risk of breaking content
that uses it, so it should be safe to redefine it.

However, I would be persuaded by arguments that there is deployed
content and that a new shorthand (such as hue-rotate-hsl() for
example) should be created.

Best regards,
 Chris                            mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Friday, 18 October 2013 16:59:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:49:47 UTC